09/02/1911:
A violent incident between police and students occurred shortly after noon for a "Pintata" convened by the university.
During the collision, was arrested at least eight young people and others were wounded, according to Radio Island
agents had been mobilized to the frontal area of \u200b\u200bthe Biblioteca José M . Lazarus, where they were students. Television images presented to agents of the Division Tactical Operations (DOT), better known as the Strike Force, hitting students with nightsticks. (ElNuevodia)
police repressed a group of students who were painting slogans on the street which is located opposite the General Library, Joseph M. Lazarus. Preliminary reports indicate that at least 20 students arrested. One member of the Dialogue was affected by the use of pepper spray.
Students via Radio reported strike, the "abuses" of police officers who fired pepper spray directly on the peaceful demonstrators who were painting slogans and claims in the said road, as well as batons to students who were already on the ground. (Diálogodigital)
A mutiny has been developed in the afternoon in the University of Puerto Rico between students and police. In the incident, some students were roseados with pepper spray.
Apparently there batons and arrested about 15 students, including student leader, Adriana Mulero.
Students painted on the street from the general library, Joseph M. Lazarus when seized by the police. Several policemen and members of the Police were painted after the students throw paint cans. (Primerahora)
clashes between police and students.
A riot occurred this afternoon in front of the library José M. Lazarus from the University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras between police and students staged a demonstration. So far 20 people have been arrested and an undetermined number of demonstrators were injured. It is unknown what triggered the collision. Students performed minutes before an activity in which painted the streets of the campus. Amid the shock threw the paint students used to protest over the police. Young people who crossed the street at the time of tension and were not part of the demonstration were also arrested, beaten and thrown to the ground. The images broadcast on Univision Presents The policemen arresting youths and assaulted while handcuffed on the floor. (Elvocero)
02/08/1911:
arrested students in the Faculty of Social Sciences. Varios estudiantes fueron arrestados al mediodía de hoy en la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales del Recinto de Río Piedras de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. Esto, mientras pintaban murales con mensajes alusivos a la huelga en los edificios de esa facultad, confirmó Xiomara Caro, portavoz del Comité de Representación Estudianti. (Primerahora)
Otra nota de prensa informa:
Un grupo amplio de estudiantes se encuentra marchando de facultad en facultad en el interior del recinto riopedrense de la Universidad de Puerto Rico. La manifestación surgió en repudio a un incidente en el que se arrestó al estudiante Yarid Yadiel López E in the picnic area of \u200b\u200bSocial Sciences. According to students who witnessed the incident, while protesters were on a Pintata in the area of \u200b\u200bSocial Sciences, a policeman approached the student López Correa, took a picture and then arrested him. According to the student Yaritza Figueroa, after the incident with the police, she and another student went to the Ombudsperson to denounce the arrest of Lopez and walked back several officers began making fun of them throwing kisses. (ElNuevodía)
Motivated by this information and based on the premise supported by the courts que la Policía estatal no puede arrestar estudiantes universitarios meramente por violaciones a los Reglamentos universitarios procedemos a adelantar ciertos apuntes fundamentales que nuevamente nos arrojan luz sobre el carácter ilegal e inconstitucional de estos arrestos en la Universidad de Puerto Rico:
Nuestra libertad de expresión, protegida por la Primera Enmienda en la Carta de Derechos de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos (con su correspondiente articulado análogo Sección 4 de la Carta de Derechos de la Constitución del Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico), es de nuestros derechos constitucionales más importantes.
exactly is protected by the First Amendment is often misunderstood.
"Congress Shall make no law. . . abridging the freedom of speech. "
never pass any law restricting freedom of speech ...
First the word" speech "(literal translation of 'speech') by a long succession of decisions of the Supreme as a concept has been extended far beyond verbal communication ordinary. Protected speech now includes non-verbal expression. The same happens when our Constitution says literally 'word'.
important work of philosophers who have considered freedom of expression, for example John Stuart Mill (On Liberty ") - is inevitably a reference that helps in explaining the rational analysis of these expressions -verbal.
symbolic expression is a legal term in jurisprudence and American legal doctrine used to describe the actions that carry significantly a particular message or a visual or auditory statement. Symbolic expressions are recognized as protected under the First Amendment as a form of legitimate discourse, as a constitutionally valid expression that are not necessarily written as such.
The Supreme Court of the United States has argued that this form of expressive behavior is a right under the protection of the First Amendment of the Constitution from Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359, 51 S. Ct. 532, 75 L. Ed 1117 (1931).
In his majority opinion in United States v . O'Brien , 391 U.S. 367 (1968) el Honorable Juez Warren describió una serie de pautas usadas para determinar si un acto restringe o viola la Primera Enmienda. Estas pautas deben ser neutrales en lo referente al tema, es decir, un discurso que critica la acción gubernamental se debe tratar de la misma manera que un discurso bajo circunstancias idénticas que elogia al gobierno.
Las supresiones del Derecho de expresión no son violaciones de la Primera Enmienda a menos que el estado haga la supresión. El estado puede ser el gobierno federal o un gobierno estatal o cualquiera de sus criaturas incluyendo corporaciones públicas, universidades the state or law enforcement.
Here:
"If there is a fundamental principle of the bedrock base of the First Amendment, is that the government may not prohibit expression of an idea simply because society (supposedly) finds the idea offensive or disagreeable. " v. Texas Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 414 (1989). "[S] n all, the First Amendment means that government has no power to restrict expression because of its message [or] its ideas," Police Dept. of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 95 (1972), which is to say that "he principle of neutrality of view ... is the basis of the First Amendment, " Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc., 466 U.S. 485, 505 (1984) ...
Members of City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent , 466 U.S. 789, 804 (1984) ("The First Amendment forbids the government to regulate the expression of the way that favors some viewpoints or ideas at the expense of others") ...
is clear that artistic expression lies within the protection of the First Amendment. See, v. Hurley Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc., 515 U.S. 557, 569 (1995) (notes that examples of painting, music, and poetry "arguably protected"); ... Kaplan v. California , 413 U.S. 115, 119-120 (1973) ("Pictures, movies, paintings, drawings, and prints ... have protection of the First Amendment.") The constitutional protection of artistic works is based not on political significance may be attributable to such productions, though they may indeed comment on political issues, but simply on their expressive character, which falls within a spectrum “discurso protegido” que se extiende hacia la base de declaraciones abiertamente políticas. Dicho de otro modo, el arte tiene derecho a la protección completa porque nuestra “vida cultural,” al igual que nuestra política nativa, “descansa sobre el ideal” de la neutralidad del punto de vista gubernamental. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. FCC, 512 U.S. 622, 641 (1994).
...
El arte “puede afectar las actitudes y al comportamiento público de una variedad de maneras, extendiéndose desde apoyar de manera directa una doctrina política o social a formar sutilmente el pensamiento que caracteriza toda la expresión artística. Joseph Burstyn, Inc. v. Wilson, 343 U.S. 495, 501 (1952). Quoted as footnote.
NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR ARTS v. FINLEY 524 U.S. 569 (1998)
This paper we have addressed the urgent need to vigorously denounce the gender bias of the misconduct of members of the Police on the grounds university students who have been previous complaints.
Please see: Re
lust crimes under color of authority
http://ortizfeliciano.blogspot.com/2011/02/re-delitos-de-lascivia-so-color-de . html
Please see reports:
http://www.wapa.tv/noticias/primera-plana/vuelve-a-complicarse-el-conflicto-en-la-upr/20110209154115
http://www.wapa.tv/vervideo.php?nid=20110209165700
Note .- Contains footage are strong and clear abuse of shock moments students remain on the floor, police obviously out of control, that these attacks have been launched to suppress an act of artistic expression like painting a mural is completely baffling ...
Gallery of police terror in the UPR: attacks by painting a mural:
0 comments:
Post a Comment